Note: This is part of a series, you can find the related posts here…
One thing is as true with SL as it was with HTML and CSS: Starting with a basic layout of the pages and a “site map” really helps a lot. (Trying to work with a style system that you don’t know doesn’t.)
The application created by the template looks like this:
It’s a navigation application with head area (including menu) and remaining work area. It uses a Grid control, yet only as kind of canvas, all controls are placed via margins and alignments. I find this, well, curious, there is a canvas control after all. But the layout doesn’t suit me anyway.
So the first step is to get rid of all styles, i.e. I cleaned Assets/Styles.xaml. That included removing all references to these styles, as in this fragment:
Searching with a little regular expression solves that problem. Now for the intended layout:
I want to have a head area with application title and other information. A left area containing the menu. A bottom line with legal information. And finally the remaining area for our pages. And some space between for some visual separation.
In SL this is done with a Grid. Curiously enough, for this is akin to table layout in HTML. I wonder when the CSS gang will show up and cry wolf
Most samples show and explain how to write the markup to define rows and columns. But then, most samples are pre-created and reiterated, and I have problems “mind rendering” the markup. With the Silverlight 2 SDK there was at least a kind of preview in VS, but with SL3 that preview does not work (the document outline may help to navigate larger XAML files, though):
So I chose a different way and put Blend to its first use…
Defining the desired Grid layout can be done easily in Blend. Placing rows and columns is just a mouse click away: Clicking on the areas to the left or the top adds new rows and columns. Clicking on the symbols changes the type. If you don’t see them, change the layout mode by clicking in the upper left icon.
Once the rough layout is done, it can be saved and one can switch back to VS. The resulting markup is very clean, Blend generally does a good job producing clean markup and at the same time leaving your markup as it was.
Placing the contents
Next step was creating controls for the three areas (head, menu, footer) and move the respective content from the page there (copy & paste in VS). The markup now only contains the navigation frame, which is the working area. Drag & drop and some more mouse jostling in Blend positions that control in the correct cell:
And sizing it correctly:
Also – after recompiling the solution – Blend picked up the user controls and offered them as assets if you select Project. Again some mouse jostling later (and with different backgrounds colors for each user control to distinguish them) the result looks like this:
Blend automatically generated a namespace definition as prefix for the controls, using a veeerrrryyyy long prefix name. But that’s easy to solve and to replace with control. The final markup is, again, very clean:
After some working on the user controls and some styling… alright, it may take some time, but had it ready from some internal application, and besides it was done by a colleague, for if I had done it myself if would probably cause eye cataracts… , the end result looks like this:
This may all seem trivial if you’ve been through this experience once. Bottom line I guess is the way I worked through this (which may or may not work for you). It’s the combination of VS and Blend, working with both tools at the same time. Even if you are a markup guy rather than design time worker in ASP.NET, my recommendation is that you give Blend a chance. It’s far more stable than the ASP.NET designer in VS ever was. I’m not saying you should switch to Blend, just get the best of both, VS and Blend.
The next post will contain some real code, promise
That’s all for now folks,